IGNOU BHIC-108 Solved Question Paper PDF Download

IGNOU BHIC-108 Previous Year Solved Question Paper in Hindi

IGNOU BHIC-108 Previous Year Solved Question Paper in English

Q1. What were the main features of Mercantilism? Evaluate the impact of mercantilist ideas on Holland, England and France in 17th and 18th centuries.

Ans. Mercantilism was the dominant economic theory in Europe from the 16th to the 18th century. It was a form of economic nationalism aimed at building a wealthy and powerful state, with national power measured by its hoard of gold and silver (bullion).

Main Features:

• Bullionism: The core belief that a nation’s wealth is determined by the amount of gold and silver it possesses. Policies were therefore designed to accumulate precious metals.
• Favourable Balance of Trade: Mercantilists argued that a country must maximize exports and minimize imports. This ensured a net inflow of gold and silver.
• State Intervention: The government actively intervened in the economy. This included subsidizing industries, restricting imports through tariffs and quotas, and establishing trade monopolies (like the East India Companies).
• Colonialism: Colonies were seen as essential for the economic benefit of the mother country. They served as a source of cheap raw materials and a protected market for finished goods.
• Naval Power: A strong navy and merchant fleet were considered vital for protecting and expanding trade routes.

Impact on Different Countries:

Holland (The Netherlands): In the 17th century, Holland was the leading mercantile power. Its approach was focused on trade and shipping. Powerful trading companies, like the Dutch East India Company (VOC), monopolized Asian trade. However, unlike the French and English models, Holland had less direct state intervention. Its success was based on efficient shipping, financial innovations (like the Bank of Amsterdam), and trade dominance. It was eventually eclipsed by England, whose aggressive policies, particularly the Navigation Acts, targeted Dutch trade.

England: England successfully adopted and adapted mercantilism. The Navigation Acts , from 1651 onwards, were designed to break Dutch trade dominance and ensure that trade with English colonies was conducted only on English ships. This fostered the growth of the Royal Navy and the English merchant fleet. The British East India Company expanded British power in India, while colonies in North America and the Caribbean generated immense wealth (especially from sugar and tobacco). Mercantilism fuelled England’s rise as a global power and laid the groundwork for the Industrial Revolution.

France: In France, mercantilism is known as ‘Colbertism’ , named after Louis XIV’s finance minister, Jean-Baptiste Colbert. The French model was highly state-directed. Colbert focused on developing domestic industries, especially luxury goods (like tapestries and silk). He discouraged foreign goods by imposing high tariffs and promoted French trading companies. However, Colbertism met with mixed success. Constant wars, an inefficient tax system, and the relative weakness of the merchant middle class made French mercantilism less effective than the English model in the long run.

In summary, mercantilism played a crucial role in shaping the nation-states of early modern Europe, but its implementation and degree of success varied significantly in each country.

Q2. Describe in brief the major intellectual trends that were dominant in seventeenth century Europe.

Ans. The 17th century was a period of profound intellectual ferment in Europe, laying the foundations for modern Western thought. During this era, traditional beliefs were challenged, and new ways of understanding the world, based on reason, observation, and mathematics, came to the fore. The major intellectual trends were:

1. The Scientific Revolution: This was the most significant trend. It overthrew the ancient Aristotelian and Ptolemaic views of the cosmos.

• Astronomy: Galileo Galilei used the telescope to provide concrete evidence for Copernicus’s heliocentric model. Johannes Kepler discovered the mathematical laws of planetary motion. The revolution culminated in Isaac Newton’s Principia Mathematica (1687) , where he formulated the universal law of gravitation and the three laws of motion, presenting a picture of a mechanical and orderly universe.
• The Scientific Method: Francis Bacon emphasized empiricism (observation and experimentation as the source of knowledge), while René Descartes championed rationalism (reason and deduction). Both approaches contributed to the development of the modern scientific method.

2. New Philosophy: The Scientific Revolution gave rise to new ideas in philosophy.

• Rationalism: René Descartes (“I think, therefore I am”) subjected all knowledge to doubt and emphasized the power of reason as the basis for certainty. He believed certain ideas were innate.
• Empiricism: John Locke argued that the mind at birth is a ‘blank slate’ (tabula rasa) and that all knowledge comes from sensory experience. This idea profoundly influenced the later Enlightenment.

3. Political Thought: The crises of the 17th century, particularly civil wars and revolts, sparked intense debate about the nature of political authority.

• Theories of Absolutism: Thomas Hobbes, in his book Leviathan (1651) , argued that to escape chaos, people should surrender their rights to a sovereign ruler in exchange for security. Others like Bishop Bossuet defended the theory of the Divine Right of Kings, stating that monarchs were accountable only to God.
• The Rise of Liberalism and Constitutionalism: John Locke, in his Two Treatises of Government (1689), put forth the idea of natural rights (life, liberty, and property). He argued that government’s legitimacy rests on the consent of the governed and that people have the right to overthrow a government that violates these rights. This laid the foundation for constitutional monarchy and modern liberalism.

These intellectual trends collectively offered a new way of seeing the world, one focused on reason, evidence, and human rights, rather than superstition and tradition. This set the stage for the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Q3. Briefly describe the nature of conflict between the King and the Parliament in England till 1649.

Ans. The conflict between the King and Parliament in England up to 1649 was a long and complex process that culminated in civil war and the execution of King Charles I. The struggle was fundamentally about who held ultimate sovereign power in the country: the monarch or Parliament. The main areas of conflict were religion, finance, and the nature of governance.

Background and James I (1603-1625): While the Tudor monarchs had worked cooperatively with Parliament, the Stuart king, James I of Scotland, believed in the ‘Divine Right of Kings’ . He held that the king’s power came from God and he was accountable only to God. He clashed repeatedly with Parliament over issues like taxation and foreign policy, creating an atmosphere of mistrust.

Charles I’s Reign (1625-1649) and Escalation of Conflict: Charles I continued his father’s absolutist tendencies, intensifying the conflict.

• Financial Disputes: Charles demanded money from Parliament for his expensive foreign policies, which Parliament refused. In response, he resorted to forced loans and other extra-legal taxes. In 1628, Parliament forced him to sign the ‘Petition of Right’ , which outlawed non-parliamentary taxation and arbitrary imprisonment. Charles signed it but soon ignored it.
• Personal Rule (1629-1640): In 1629, Charles dissolved Parliament and ruled without it for eleven years. During this period, he imposed controversial taxes like ‘Ship Money’ across the country and used prerogative courts like the Star Chamber to punish his opponents.
• Religious Conflict: Charles and the Archbishop of Canterbury, William Laud, tried to impose high-church Anglican practices on the Church of England, angering the country’s Puritans. When they tried to impose a new prayer book on the Presbyterians of Scotland, the Scots rebelled (the Bishops’ Wars).

Civil War and the End of Monarchy: To raise funds for the war with Scotland, Charles was forced to recall Parliament in 1640. This ‘Long Parliament’ moved swiftly to curtail the king’s powers. When Charles attempted to arrest five leading members of Parliament in 1642, civil war broke out.

The war was fought between the King’s supporters (Royalists or Cavaliers) and Parliament’s supporters (Parliamentarians or Roundheads). The military success of Parliament’s ‘New Model Army’ , led by Oliver Cromwell, ultimately ensured the king’s defeat. In January 1649, Charles I was tried for treason and executed. This act abolished the monarchy and declared England a republic (the Commonwealth). The conflict was a turning point that decisively shifted sovereignty from the King to Parliament.

Q4. Write short notes on any two of the following in about 200 words each : (a) Impact of 17th century crisis on Europe (b) Music in the 17th century (c) Development in non-quantitative fields of Science (d) Protestant Reformation

Ans.

(a) Impact of 17th century crisis on Europe The 17th century is often described by historians as a period of ‘general crisis’. This crisis had profound and varied impacts on Europe.

• Demographic Impact: The Thirty Years’ War (1618-1648), famine, and outbreaks of plague led to significant population decline or stagnation in many parts of Central and Southern Europe. The German lands, for instance, lost a large fraction of their population.
• Economic Impact: The Mediterranean region, previously Europe’s economic heartland, experienced decline. In contrast, Atlantic economies like England and the Netherlands rose to prominence. There was a slump in agricultural production and wild fluctuations in prices. The crisis shifted Europe’s economic centre of gravity from the south to the north-west.
• Political Impact: In response to the instability of the crisis, absolutist monarchy was strengthened in most European states. In countries like France, Austria, and Prussia, rulers centralized their power. In England, by contrast, the crisis led to a revolution that resulted in a constitutional monarchy. There were widespread revolts across Europe, such as the Fronde in France and rebellions in Spain. In short, the crisis reshaped the political and economic landscape of Europe.

(d) Protestant Reformation The Protestant Reformation was a religious movement that began in the 16th century, but its impact remained profound throughout the 17th century and beyond. It was initiated in 1517 by Martin Luther’s publication of the ’95 Theses’, in which he criticised Catholic Church practices like the sale of indulgences.

The core tenets of the Reformation were:

• Sola Fide (Faith Alone): Salvation is achieved through faith alone, not by good works.
• Sola Scriptura (Scripture Alone): The Bible is the sole source of religious authority, not Church traditions or the Pope.
• Priesthood of all believers: A believer does not need a priest to have access to God.

Key figures in the movement included Martin Luther (Germany), John Calvin (Geneva), and Huldrych Zwingli (Switzerland). The Reformation shattered the unity of Western Christendom and led to centuries of religious conflict between Catholics and Protestants, culminating in the Thirty Years’ War. It also strengthened the power of secular rulers, who took control of the church in their territories. Due to its emphasis on reading the Bible, the Reformation also promoted literacy and the development of vernacular languages.

Q5. Briefly discuss the nature of state and politics in England and France in the 18th century.

Ans. In the 18th century, England and France presented two very different models of state and politics, reflecting their divergent historical trajectories.

England: Constitutional Monarchy Following the Glorious Revolution of 1688, England was established as a constitutional monarchy .

• Nature of the State: Sovereignty was divided between the King and Parliament. The monarch remained the head of state, but their powers were limited by law. Parliament, consisting of the House of Lords and the House of Commons, held the supreme power to legislate and tax. Influenced by the ideas of John Locke, government was understood to be based on the consent of the governed.
• Nature of Politics: Politics was dominated by two major factions, the Whigs and the Tories. These were not rigid modern political parties but loose coalitions of the elite. The period saw the rise of the office of the Prime Minister , with Robert Walpole considered the first de facto holder of the position. Although a parliamentary system existed, it was not democratic. The franchise was very limited, and politics remained a game of patronage, influence, and family connections. Nevertheless, this system provided political stability, which fostered economic growth and the building of a global empire.

France: Absolutist Monarchy 18th-century France was the epitome of an absolutist monarchy under the Ancien Régime .

• Nature of the State: In theory, the king held absolute and divinely ordained power. Rulers like Louis XV and Louis XVI governed under the theory of the ‘Divine Right of Kings’ articulated by Bossuet. All power resided in the monarch, and he was accountable to no earthly institution. The government was administered through a centralized bureaucratic network of royal officials called ‘Intendants’.
• Nature of Politics: France had no national representative body like the English Parliament. The Estates-General had not been convened since 1614. Politics was primarily focused on the intrigues and factionalism within the royal court at Versailles. The ‘parlements’ (high courts of justice) could protest royal edicts, but the king could overrule them. This rigid system proved unable to cope with the growing tensions in society. A deeply inefficient tax system, which exempted the nobility and clergy, brought the state to the brink of bankruptcy, which ultimately became a major cause of the French Revolution of 1789.

In sum, England’s flexible constitutional system allowed it to flourish, while France’s rigid absolutism was headed for collapse.

Q6. Discuss the demographic trends in Europe in 17th and 18th centuries.

Ans. The demographic trends in Europe during the 17th and 18th centuries represent two distinct phases. The 17th century was broadly a period of stagnation and crisis, while the 18th century saw the beginning of an unprecedented and sustained population growth.

The 17th Century: Stagnation and Crisis This century is often called a period of demographic crisis, where overall population growth was very slow or even negative in some regions. The main causes were the “Malthusian checks”:

• War: The Thirty Years’ War (1618-1648) , in particular, devastated Central Europe, especially Germany, causing massive population loss through direct casualties and indirectly through famine and disease.
• Famine: This period coincided with the “Little Ice Age,” which led to cooler, wetter weather, causing crop failures and widespread famines.
• Disease: Epidemics of bubonic plague, though not as devastating as the 14th-century Black Death, still recurred in many parts of Europe, keeping mortality rates high.

Regionally, Spain, Italy, and Germany saw population decline, while Atlantic nations like England and the Netherlands continued to experience slow growth, reflecting their rising economic strength.

The 18th Century: The Beginning of a Population Boom From the mid-18th century, Europe’s population began a dramatic and sustained increase. From around 120 million in 1700, it grew to about 190 million by 1800. This growth marked the beginning of Europe’s escape from the “Malthusian trap.” The reasons for this were complex:

• Decline in Mortality: This was the most significant factor.
  • Reduced Disease: The mysterious disappearance of the plague from Europe was a major cause. The last major epidemic was in Marseilles in 1720.
  • Better Nutrition: The introduction of new crops like the potato and maize, which were more reliable and calorie-rich, improved diets and reduced the impact of famines. Better transportation made it easier to move food from surplus to deficit areas.
  • Changing Nature of Warfare: Wars became less destructive and targeted civilian populations less frequently.
• Birth Rate: In some areas, an increase in economic opportunities led people to marry earlier, causing a slight rise in the birth rate.

This population growth provided the labour force for the upcoming agricultural and industrial revolutions but also put pressure on resources and spurred social change.

Q7. Evaluate the process of divergence in economic development of the Western Europe and the rest of the world.

Ans. The 17th and 18th centuries witnessed a significant divergence in economic development between Western Europe and the rest of the world, particularly the large Asian empires like China and India. This process is termed “The Great Divergence” by historian Kenneth Pomeranz. It was the period when Western Europe, particularly North-Western Europe, embarked on a unique economic path that ultimately led to the Industrial Revolution.

Factors in Western Europe’s Development:

1. Institutional Advantages:
   • Property Rights: Europe had strong legal protections for private property, which encouraged investment and innovation.
   • Financial Innovations: The development of joint-stock companies (like the Dutch and British East India Companies), national banks (like the Bank of England), and stock exchanges made it possible to mobilize large-scale capital and manage commercial risks.
   • Political Competition: The constant military and economic rivalry among Europe’s competitive states fostered innovation and efficiency.
2. Technology and Science: The Scientific Revolution created a culture that valued observation, experimentation, and the mastery of the natural world. While direct technological applications were not immediate, it created a mindset that later fueled improvements in agriculture (crop rotation) and manufacturing (proto-industrialization).
3. Colonialism and Global Trade:
   • Access to Resources: The discovery and colonization of the Americas gave Europe unprecedented access to land, resources (silver, sugar), and cheap labour (through slavery). This helped Europe overcome its own land and energy constraints.
   • Creation of Markets: Colonial empires provided protected markets for European manufactured goods, stimulating industrial production. The Atlantic slave trade generated vast profits that were reinvested into European economies.

The Situation in the “Rest of the World” (A Comparative Perspective):

• China (Qing Dynasty): In the 18th century, China’s economy was the world’s largest and highly sophisticated. However, it was caught in a “high-level equilibrium trap.” Its agriculture was productive and its markets well-developed, but it lacked the key factors for an industrial breakthrough, such as easily accessible coal near industrial centers and a state committed to overseas commercial expansion.
• India (Mughal Empire): India was a major textile producer and exporter. However, the political fragmentation of the Mughal Empire after Aurangzeb created instability. European companies, especially the British East India Company, exploited this weakness, gradually transforming from traders to rulers. They de-industrialized the Indian economy to serve British interests.

Conclusion: The “Great Divergence” was not the result of a single factor but a unique combination of institutions, technology, colonial exploitation, and certain contingent geographical advantages (like the location of coal) in Western Europe. While other regions were highly developed, they lacked the specific combination of factors necessary for the rise of industrial capitalism.

Q8. Write short notes on any two of the following in about 200 words each : (a) The meaning of Enlightenment (b) The Boston Tea Party (c) European Marriage Pattern (d) The nature of Book Production in the Early Modern Europe

Ans.

(a) The meaning of Enlightenment The Enlightenment was a major intellectual and cultural movement of the 18th century, centered on reason, science, and individualism. Its core idea was that human reason could be used to understand and improve the universe, society, and the self. It challenged tradition, superstition, and authority, especially that of the church and absolute monarchy.

The German philosopher Immanuel Kant defined the Enlightenment’s motto as “Sapere Aude!” or “Dare to know!”. The thinkers of this movement were known as ‘philosophes’, and included prominent figures like Voltaire (a proponent of religious tolerance and free speech), Montesquieu (theory of the separation of powers), and Rousseau (social contract and popular sovereignty). These thinkers emphasized themes such as natural law, liberty, progress, and happiness. The Enlightenment provided the intellectual foundations for the American and French Revolutions and profoundly influenced the development of modern secularism, human rights, and liberal democracy.

(b) The Boston Tea Party The Boston Tea Party was a pivotal event on December 16, 1773, that became a major catalyst for the American Revolution. It was a political protest by American colonists against the policies of the British government.

The background was the Tea Act of 1773 , passed by the British Parliament. The Act was designed to save the struggling British East India Company by allowing it to sell its tea directly to the American colonies. This bypassed colonial merchants and lowered the price of tea, but the colonists saw it as a violation of the principle of “no taxation without representation.” They viewed it as another assault on their economic freedom.

In protest, a group of colonists called the ‘Sons of Liberty’, disguised as Native Americans, boarded three tea ships in Boston Harbor and threw 342 chests of tea into the sea. The British government reacted harshly, passing the ‘Coercive Acts’, known in the colonies as the ‘Intolerable Acts’. These acts closed Boston Harbor and curtailed Massachusetts’ self-government. This punitive response united the colonies and led directly to the convening of the First Continental Congress.