IGNOU MPH-007 Solved Question Paper PDF Download

IGNOU MPH-007 Previous Year Solved Question Paper in Hindi

IGNOU MPH-007 Previous Year Solved Question Paper in English

Q1. State and establish Poynting theorem for electromagnetic fields. Compare it with the equation of continuity and give an interpretation of Poynting vector.

Ans. Statement of Poynting’s Theorem: Poynting’s theorem describes the conservation of energy in electromagnetic fields. It states that the rate at which work is done on the charges within a given volume, plus the rate of increase of electromagnetic energy stored within that volume, is equal to the total energy flowing into that volume. Mathematically, it is expressed as: ∮ _S S ⋅ d a = – ∫ _V ( J ⋅ E ) dV – d/dt ∫ _V u dV where S is the Poynting vector, J is the current density, E is the electric field, and u is the electromagnetic energy density.

Establishment (Derivation) of Poynting’s Theorem: The energy density (u) in an electromagnetic field is given by: u = ½ ( E ⋅ D + B ⋅ H ) For a linear, isotropic medium, D = ε E and B = μ H , so u = ½ (εE² + B²/μ). The rate of change of energy density with respect to time is: ∂u/∂t = ε E ⋅ ∂ E /∂t + (1/μ) B ⋅ ∂ B /∂t

From Maxwell’s equations: 1. ∇ × E = -∂ B /∂t 2. ∇ × H = J + ∂ D /∂t = J + ε∂ E /∂t

From the second equation, ε∂ E /∂t = ∇ × H – J . Substituting this into the equation for ∂u/∂t: ∂u/∂t = E ⋅ (∇ × H – J ) + H ⋅ (-∇ × E ) (since B = μH and using the first equation) ∂u/∂t = E ⋅ (∇ × H ) – E ⋅ J – H ⋅ (∇ × E )

Using the vector identity ∇ ⋅ ( E × H ) = H ⋅ (∇ × E ) – E ⋅ (∇ × H ): ∂u/∂t = -∇ ⋅ ( E × H ) – E ⋅ J Rearranging this gives: ∇ ⋅ ( E × H ) + ∂u/∂t = – E ⋅ J

This is the differential form of Poynting’s theorem. Here, S = E × H is defined as the Poynting vector . The term – E ⋅ J represents the rate of work done by the field on the charges per unit volume.

Comparison with the Equation of Continuity: The equation of continuity for charge conservation is: ∇ ⋅ J + ∂ρ/∂t = 0 This equation states that the current flowing out of a volume (∇ ⋅ J ) is equal to the rate of decrease of charge density (ρ) within that volume (-∂ρ/∂t).

Comparing Poynting’s theorem, ∇ ⋅ S + ∂u/∂t = – E ⋅ J , to the continuity equation, we can see an analogy:

• The Poynting vector S is analogous to the energy flux density (energy current), just as J is the charge flux density (charge current).
• The energy density u is analogous to the charge density ρ.
• The term – E ⋅ J acts as a source (or sink) term, representing the exchange of energy between the field and the charges. If this term is zero, the theorem becomes a continuity equation for energy: ∇ ⋅ S + ∂u/∂t = 0.

Interpretation of Poynting Vector: The Poynting vector, S = E × H , represents the energy flux density . Its direction indicates the direction in which electromagnetic energy is propagating, and its magnitude gives the amount of energy flowing per unit area per unit time. Its SI unit is Watts per square meter (W/m²). It is a fundamental concept for understanding the transport of energy by electromagnetic waves.

Q2. Show that Maxwell’s equations can be written as two coupled second order differential equations in terms of scalar potential Φ and vector potential A. What are Coulomb gauge and Lorentz gauge conditions ?

Ans. To express Maxwell’s equations in terms of the scalar potential (Φ) and vector potential ( A ), we start with the definitions of these potentials.

Since the divergence of B is always zero (∇ ⋅ B = 0), we can express B as the curl of some vector field A : B = ∇ × A —(1)

Substituting this into Faraday’s law of induction (∇ × E = -∂ B /∂t): ∇ × E = -∂/∂t (∇ × A ) ∇ × ( E + ∂ A /∂t) = 0

Since the curl of the gradient of any scalar function is always zero, we can write the term in the parenthesis as the gradient of a scalar potential Φ: E + ∂ A /∂t = -∇Φ E = -∇Φ – ∂ A /∂t —(2)

Now we substitute these expressions (1) and (2) into the remaining two Maxwell’s equations:

1. Gauss’s Law (∇ ⋅ E = ρ/ε₀): ∇ ⋅ (-∇Φ – ∂ A /∂t) = ρ/ε₀ -∇²Φ – ∂/∂t(∇ ⋅ A ) = ρ/ε₀ ∇²Φ + ∂/∂t(∇ ⋅ A) = -ρ/ε₀ —(3)

2. Ampere-Maxwell Law (∇ × B = μ₀J + μ₀ε₀∂E/∂t): ∇ × (∇ × A ) = μ₀ J + μ₀ε₀∂/∂t(-∇Φ – ∂ A /∂t) Using the vector identity ∇ × (∇ × A ) = ∇(∇ ⋅ A ) – ∇² A : ∇(∇ ⋅ A ) – ∇² A = μ₀ J – μ₀ε₀∇(∂Φ/∂t) – μ₀ε₀(∂² A /∂t²) Rearranging the terms: (∇²A – μ₀ε₀∂²A/∂t²) – ∇(∇ ⋅ A + μ₀ε₀∂Φ/∂t) = -μ₀J —(4)

Equations (3) and (4) are equivalent to Maxwell’s equations, but now expressed in terms of the scalar potential Φ and vector potential A . These are two second-order differential equations that are coupled, meaning the equation for Φ involves A and the equation for A involves Φ.

Gauge Conditions: The potentials Φ and A are not uniquely defined. We can change A to A ‘ = A + ∇λ and Φ to Φ’ = Φ – ∂λ/∂t (where λ is any scalar function) without changing the E and B fields. This freedom can be used to simplify equations (3) and (4), which is known as choosing a gauge .

1. Coulomb Gauge: The Coulomb gauge condition is: ∇ ⋅ A = 0 Applying this condition, equation (3) simplifies to a simple Poisson’s equation: ∇²Φ = -ρ/ε₀ This is identical to electrostatics. However, the equation for the vector potential (4) remains coupled: ∇² A – μ₀ε₀∂² A /∂t² – μ₀ε₀∇(∂Φ/∂t) = -μ₀ J The Coulomb gauge is particularly useful for electrostatics and magnetostatics problems.

2. Lorentz Gauge: The Lorentz gauge condition is: ∇ ⋅ A + μ₀ε₀∂Φ/∂t = 0 Applying this condition, the second term in equation (4) becomes zero, leading to the decoupling of equations (3) and (4): ∇²Φ – μ₀ε₀∂²Φ/∂t² = -ρ/ε₀ ∇² A – μ₀ε₀∂² A /∂t² = -μ₀ J Both equations have the same differential operator (∇² – μ₀ε₀∂²/∂t²), known as the d’Alembertian operator (□²). These are inhomogeneous wave equations. The Lorentz gauge condition is relativistically invariant and is very useful for studying electromagnetic radiation.

Q3. If E = E₀ e ^{i(ωt – ky + z)} and B = B₀ e ^{i(ωt – ky + z)} then show that : (a) ∇ × E = -i(k × E₀) e ^{i(ωt – ky + z)} (b) ∇ × E = -∂B/∂t implies B₀ = (k/ω)(ŷ × E₀) = (1/c)(ŷ × E₀)

Ans. The given electric and magnetic fields represent plane waves. From the phase term (ωt – ky + z), we can see that this is not a generic k ⋅ r form. The phase here is k _y y + k _z z, where k _y = -k and k _z = 1. Thus, the wave vector is k = (0, -k, 1). However, the question uses the ŷ direction in part (b), which suggests there might be a simpler assumption about the wave propagation direction. We will first do the general derivation and then consider the specific form given. Let’s assume a general plane wave E = E₀ e ^{i(ωt – k ⋅ r )} .

(a) Calculation of ∇ × E: We need to calculate the curl of E = E₀ e ^{i(ωt – k ⋅ r )} . ∇ × E = ∇ × [ E₀ e ^{i(ωt – k ⋅ r )} ] Using the vector identity ∇ × (f G ) = f(∇ × G ) + (∇f) × G , with f = e ^{i(ωt – k ⋅ r )} and G = E₀ (a constant vector). Since E₀ is a constant vector, ∇ × E₀ = 0. Therefore, ∇ × E = (∇ e ^{i(ωt – k ⋅ r )} ) × E₀ .

Now, we calculate ∇f: ∇f = ∇(e ^{i(ωt – k ⋅ r )} ) = e ^{i(ωt – k ⋅ r )} ∇(i(ωt – k ⋅ r )) ∇(i(ωt – k ⋅ r )) = -i ∇( k ⋅ r ) = -i ∇(k _x x + k _y y + k _z z) = -i(k _x x̂ + k _y ŷ + k _z ẑ ) = -i k So, ∇f = -i k e ^{i(ωt – k ⋅ r )} .

Substituting this back into the expression for ∇ × E : ∇ × E = (-i k e ^{i(ωt – k ⋅ r )} ) × E₀ ∇ × E = -i ( k × E₀ ) e ^{i(ωt – k ⋅ r )} Since E = E₀ e ^{i(ωt – k ⋅ r )} , we can also write this as: ∇ × E = -i(k × E) In the given question, `(ωt – ky + z)` is a specific phase. This result holds in general. There is a slight typo; the result should have E₀ , not E . We were asked to prove the form `∇ × E = -i(k × E₀) e^(i(ωt-ky+z))`, which we have done.

(b) Relation between B₀ and E₀: From Faraday’s Law, ∇ × E = -∂ B /∂t. We evaluate both sides: LHS is from part (a): ∇ × E = -i( k × E₀ ) e ^{i(ωt – k ⋅ r )} RHS is: -∂ B /∂t Given B = B₀ e ^{i(ωt – k ⋅ r )} , so: ∂ B /∂t = B₀ (iω) e ^{i(ωt – k ⋅ r )} = iω B So, -∂ B /∂t = -iω B₀ e ^{i(ωt – k ⋅ r )}

Equating LHS and RHS: -i( k × E₀ ) e ^{i(ωt – k ⋅ r )} = -iω B₀ e ^{i(ωt – k ⋅ r )} Cancelling the exponential terms and -i: k × E₀ = ω B₀ or, B₀ = (1/ω)( k × E₀ )

Now consider the specific form in the question: B₀ = (k/ω)( ŷ × E₀ ). This will match the general result B₀ = (1/ω)( k × E₀ ) only if the wave vector k = k ŷ , i.e., the wave is propagating in the positive y-direction with magnitude k. However, the phase `(ωt – ky + z)` suggests a different wave vector k’ = (0, k, -1). There appears to be an inconsistency in the question. If we assume the question intended for a wave propagating in the y-direction ( k = k ŷ ), then: B₀ = (1/ω)(k ŷ × E₀ ) = (k/ω)( ŷ × E₀ )

Furthermore, for an electromagnetic wave in a vacuum, the wave speed is c = ω/| k |. If the wave is in the y-direction, then | k | = k, and c = ω/k, or k/ω = 1/c. Substituting this gives: B₀ = (1/c)( ŷ × E₀ )

Thus, under the assumption that the wave propagates in the y-direction, we can show the desired result.

Q4. (a) At time t=0, a charge q is at rest at the origin in a region of uniform static electric field E=E₀ẑ. Without assuming that v/c << 1, derive expressions for the velocity and position of the charge at time t. (b) Given B=B₀ẑ, write down the x-component and y-component of the equation m dv/dt = q v × B.

Ans. (a) Velocity and Position of the Charge: The relativistic equation of motion for a charge q is: d p /dt = F where p = γm₀ v is the relativistic momentum and F = q E is the Lorentz force. Here, m₀ is the rest mass of the particle and γ = 1/√(1 – v²/c²) is the Lorentz factor.

Given E = E₀ ẑ . The force is only in the z-direction, so the motion will be one-dimensional (assuming zero initial velocity). d/dt (γm₀v _z ) = qE₀ Integrating with respect to time: γm₀v _z = qE₀t + C Since the particle is at rest at t=0, v _z (0) = 0, so C = 0. p _z = γm₀v _z = qE₀t

Now, we must solve for v _z from this equation. v _z / √(1 – v _z ²/c²) = (qE₀t) / m₀ Squaring both sides: v _z ² / (1 – v _z ²/c²) = (qE₀t / m₀)² v _z ² = (qE₀t / m₀)² (1 – v _z ²/c²) v _z ² = (qE₀t / m₀)² – v _z ²(qE₀t / (m₀c))² v _z ² [1 + (qE₀t / (m₀c))²] = (qE₀t / m₀)² v _z ² = (qE₀t / m₀)² / [1 + (qE₀t / (m₀c))²]

The velocity is v(t) = v _z (t) ẑ , where: v _z (t) = (qE₀t / m₀) / √(1 + (qE₀t / (m₀c))²) This can also be written as v _z (t) = at / √(1 + (at/c)²), where a = qE₀/m₀ is the non-relativistic acceleration.

To find the position z(t), we integrate v _z (t) = dz/dt: z(t) = ∫₀ᵗ v _z (t’) dt’ = ∫₀ᵗ (qE₀t’ / m₀) / √(1 + (qE₀t’ / (m₀c))²) dt’ Let u = 1 + (qE₀t’ / (m₀c))². Then du = 2(qE₀ / (m₀c))² t’ dt’ => t’ dt’ = (m₀²c² / (2q²E₀²)) du The integral becomes: z(t) = (qE₀ / m₀) (m₀²c² / (2q²E₀²)) ∫ du / √u z(t) = (m₀c² / (2qE₀)) ∫ u ^-1/2 du = (m₀c² / (2qE₀)) [2√u] Substituting back the limits (at t’=0, u=1; at t’=t, u = 1 + (qE₀t / (m₀c))²): z(t) = (m₀c² / qE₀) [√(1 + (qE₀t / (m₀c))²) – √1] z(t) = (m₀c² / qE₀) [√(1 + (qE₀t / m₀c)²) – 1]

This is the position of the relativistically moving charge.

(b) Components of the Equation of Motion: The equation of motion is given as m d v /dt = q( v × B ). Here v = (v _x , v _y , v _z ) and B = (0, 0, B₀). We need to calculate the cross product v × B : v × B = | x̂ ŷ ẑ | | v _x v _y v _z | | 0 0 B₀ | = x̂ (v _y B₀ – 0) – ŷ (v _x B₀ – 0) + ẑ (0 – 0) = (v _y B₀) x̂ – (v _x B₀) ŷ

Now, we substitute this into the equation of motion: m (dv _x /dt x̂ + dv _y /dt ŷ + dv _z /dt ẑ ) = q [(v _y B₀) x̂ – (v _x B₀) ŷ ]

Comparing the components, we get the equations for the x- and y-components:

x-component: m dv _x /dt = q v _y B₀

y-component: m dv _y /dt = -q v _x B₀

(The z-component would be m dv _z /dt = 0, meaning the velocity in the z-direction is constant.) Note: The equation m d v /dt = … given in the question is the non-relativistic form. The relativistic form would be d p /dt = d(γm₀ v )/dt = q( v × B ), which would lead to a more complex set of equations. Based on the question as stated, the non-relativistic form is the expected answer.

Q5. Write Maxwell’s equations in a linear, homogeneous and isotropic dielectric material. By using the equations, find wave equations in a charge free and current free region.

Ans. Maxwell’s Equations in a Linear, Homogeneous, and Isotropic Dielectric Material:

In a general material, Maxwell’s equations (in differential form) are: 1. ∇ ⋅ D = ρ _f (Gauss’s Law for Electricity) 2. ∇ ⋅ B = 0 (Gauss’s Law for Magnetism) 3. ∇ × E = -∂ B /∂t (Faraday’s Law of Induction) 4. ∇ × H = J _f + ∂ D /∂t (Ampere-Maxwell Law)

Here ρ _f is the free charge density and J _f is the free current density. D is the electric displacement field and H is the magnetic field intensity.

For a linear, homogeneous, and isotropic (LHI) material, the relationships between these fields are simple and are called the constitutive relations:

• D = ε E
• B = μ H

where ε (permittivity) and μ (permeability) are constants of the material. They do not depend on position (homogeneous) nor direction (isotropic). Using these relations, we can write Maxwell’s equations in terms of

E

and

B

:

1. ∇ ⋅

E

= ρ

_f

/ ε

2. ∇ ⋅

B

= 0

3. ∇ ×

E

= -∂

B

/∂t

4. ∇ ×

B

= μ

J

_f

+ με(∂

E

/∂t)

Wave Equations in a Charge-Free and Current-Free Region: Consider a region where there are no free charges (ρ _f = 0) and no free currents ( J _f = 0). In this case, Maxwell’s equations become: (i) ∇ ⋅ E = 0 (ii) ∇ ⋅ B = 0 (iii) ∇ × E = -∂ B /∂t (iv) ∇ × B = με(∂ E /∂t)

We will now derive the wave equation for E . Take the curl of equation (iii): ∇ × (∇ × E ) = ∇ × (-∂ B /∂t) ∇ × (∇ × E ) = -∂/∂t (∇ × B )

Using the vector identity ∇ × (∇ × A ) = ∇(∇ ⋅ A ) – ∇² A on the left side: ∇(∇ ⋅ E ) – ∇² E = -∂/∂t (∇ × B )

Using equation (i) (∇ ⋅ E = 0), the first term vanishes: -∇² E = -∂/∂t (∇ × B )

Now, on the right side, we substitute equation (iv) (∇ × B = με ∂ E /∂t): -∇² E = -∂/∂t (με ∂ E /∂t) -∇² E = -με (∂² E /∂t²)

This yields the wave equation for E : ∇²E – με ∂²E/∂t² = 0

A similar procedure can be followed to find the wave equation for B . Take the curl of equation (iv): ∇ × (∇ × B ) = ∇ × (με ∂ E /∂t) = με ∂/∂t (∇ × E ) ∇(∇ ⋅ B ) – ∇² B = με ∂/∂t (∇ × E )

Using equation (ii) (∇ ⋅ B = 0) and equation (iii) (∇ × E = -∂ B /∂t): 0 – ∇² B = με ∂/∂t (-∂ B /∂t) -∇² B = -με (∂² B /∂t²)

This yields the wave equation for B : ∇²B – με ∂²B/∂t² = 0

These two equations describe the propagation of electromagnetic waves in the LHI material. The velocity of the wave is given by v = 1/√(με).

Q6. Obtain boundary conditions for electric field at the interface of two linear, homogeneous and isotropic dielectrics by considering there is no free charge or current densities at the interface.

Ans. We consider an interface between two linear, homogeneous, and isotropic (LHI) dielectric materials (medium 1 and medium 2). We will assume there is no free surface charge density (σ _f = 0) and no free surface current density ( K _f = 0) at the interface. We will use the integral forms of Maxwell’s equations to derive the boundary conditions for the electric field.

1. Boundary Condition for the Tangential Component of E: We start with the integral form of Faraday’s Law: ∮ E ⋅ d l = -d/dt ∫ B ⋅ d a

We consider a very small rectangular loop that straddles the interface, as shown in the figure. The length of the loop Δl is parallel to the interface, and its width Δw is perpendicular to it. We let Δw approach zero.

(Imagine a diagram of a rectangular loop between two media, with its long sides parallel to the interface and short sides perpendicular)

The line integral of E ⋅ d l around the loop is: ∮ E ⋅ d l = ∫ _top E ₁ ⋅ d l + ∫ _bottom E ₂ ⋅ d l + ∫ _sides E ⋅ d l = E₁ ^∥ Δl – E₂ ^∥ Δl + (contribution from sides) where E ^∥ is the component of E parallel to the interface.

As we let the width of the loop Δw → 0, the contribution from the sides vanishes. Also, the area enclosed by the loop goes to zero, so the change in magnetic flux on the right-hand side also goes to zero: d/dt ∫ B ⋅ d a → 0

Therefore, the equation becomes: E₁ ^∥ Δl – E₂ ^∥ Δl = 0 E₁ ^∥ = E₂ ^∥

This is the first boundary condition: The tangential component of the electric field is continuous across the interface.

2. Boundary Condition for the Normal Component of D: We start with the integral form of Gauss’s Law: ∮ D ⋅ d a = Q _{f, enclosed}

We consider a small “pillbox” (a small cylinder) with its top and bottom faces parallel to the interface, one in each medium, and a height Δh. The area of the top and bottom of the pillbox is ΔA.

(Imagine a diagram of a cylindrical pillbox straddling the interface between two media, with its flat ends parallel to the interface)

The integral of D ⋅ d a over the closed surface of the pillbox is: ∮ D ⋅ d a = ∫ _top D ₁ ⋅ d a + ∫ _bottom D ₂ ⋅ d a + ∫ _side D ⋅ d a

Let n̂ be the normal unit vector pointing from medium 2 to medium 1. ∫ _top D ₁ ⋅ d a = D₁ ^⊥ ΔA ∫ _bottom D ₂ ⋅ d a = -D₂ ^⊥ ΔA where D ^⊥ is the component of D normal to the interface.

As we let the height of the pillbox Δh → 0, the area of the side surface goes to zero, and the flux contribution from the side walls becomes negligible. The total free charge enclosed by the pillbox is Q _{f, enclosed} = σ _f ΔA. So, the equation becomes: D₁ ^⊥ ΔA – D₂ ^⊥ ΔA = σ _f ΔA

Since it is given that there is no free charge at the interface, σ _f = 0. D₁ ^⊥ – D₂ ^⊥ = 0 D₁ ^⊥ = D₂ ^⊥

This is the second boundary condition: The normal component of the electric displacement field is continuous across the interface (if there is no free surface charge).

Q7. In which context are Lienard-Wiechert (L-W) potential used in electrodynamics? Determine the Leinard-Wiechert scalar potentials (Φ) for a point charge moving with constant velocity v.

Ans. Context of Lienard-Wiechert (L-W) Potentials:

Lienard-Wiechert (L-W) potentials are used in electrodynamics to describe the electromagnetic fields generated by a moving point charge . They are the exact, time-dependent solutions to Maxwell’s equations for the scalar potential (Φ) and vector potential ( A ) due to a point charge source.

The importance of these potentials lies in the following:

• Retarded Time: The L-W potentials account for the fact that electromagnetic effects propagate at a finite speed (the speed of light, c). The potential felt by an observer at a given time t does not depend on the charge’s present position and velocity, but on its position and velocity at an earlier, or “retarded” time (t _r ). The retarded time is the moment when the charge had to emit a “signal” for it to reach the observer at time t.
• Basis of Radiation: When a charge accelerates, the L-W potentials can be used to calculate the electromagnetic fields (radiation fields) produced by the accelerating charge. This is fundamental to understanding phenomena like synchrotron radiation, bremsstrahlung, and emission by antennas.
• Connection to Relativity: The L-W potentials are derived in the Lorentz gauge and are fully consistent with the principles of special relativity.

In short, whenever we need to accurately describe the fields from a point charge that is not stationary, especially if it is accelerating, the L-W potentials are the essential tools.

L-W Scalar Potential (Φ) for a Charge with Constant Velocity:

We will determine the scalar potential Φ for a point charge q moving with a uniform velocity v . We can solve this problem using a Lorentz transformation, which is often easier than calculating the retarded time directly.

1. Rest Frame of the Charge (S’): In the inertial frame S’ moving with the charge, the charge is stationary at the origin. In this frame, the potential is just a static Coulomb potential, and there is no magnetic field ( A’ = 0). Φ'( r’ , t’) = q / (4πε₀R’) where R’ = | r’ | = √(x’² + y’² + z’²) is the distance from the origin (the charge) in S’.

2. Transformation to the Lab Frame (S): Let the frame S’ be moving with velocity v = v ẑ in the z-direction relative to the lab frame S. The Lorentz transformation equations are: x’ = x y’ = y z’ = γ(z – vt) where γ = 1/√(1 – v²/c²) is the Lorentz factor.

The scalar potential (Φ) and vector potential ( A ) transform as components of a 4-vector (Φ/c, A ). The transformation rule for Φ is: Φ = γ(Φ’ + vA’ _z )

Since the vector potential in S’ is zero ( A’ = 0), this simplifies to: Φ = γΦ’ = γ [q / (4πε₀R’)]

Now, we express R’ in terms of the S frame coordinates (x, y, z, t): R’² = x’² + y’² + z’² = x² + y² + [γ(z – vt)]² R’ = √[x² + y² + γ²(z – vt)²]

Substituting this into the expression for Φ, we get the scalar potential in the lab frame: Φ(x, y, z, t) = (1 / 4πε₀) * γq / √[x² + y² + γ²(z – vt)²]

This is the Lienard-Wiechert scalar potential for a point charge moving with uniform velocity. It is interesting to note that the potential is no longer spherically symmetric; it becomes “flattened” in the direction of motion.

Q8. Write down metric tensor in the form η _μν in Minkowski space. Show that if A ^μ (or A) is a timelike vector and B ^μ (or B) is a nonzero vector orthogonal to A ^μ , then B ^μ is necessarily spacelike.

Ans. Metric Tensor (η _μν ) in Minkowski Space:

Minkowski space, the mathematical framework of special relativity, is a 4-dimensional spacetime. The “distance” (spacetime interval) between two events in this space is defined using the metric tensor, η _μν . Using the most common signature in physics, (+, -, -, -), the metric tensor is written as a matrix: η _μν = 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & -1 \end{pmatrix}

Its components are:

• η ₀₀ = 1
• η ₁₁ = η ₂₂ = η ₃₃ = -1
• η _μν = 0 if μ ≠ ν

This metric is used to define the inner product of two 4-vectors, A

^μ

= (A⁰, A¹, A², A³) and B

^μ

= (B⁰, B¹, B², B³):

A ⋅ B = A

^μ

B

_μ

= η

_μν

A

^μ

B

^ν

= A⁰B⁰ – A¹B¹ – A²B² – A³B³

Proof: That B ^μ is necessarily spacelike.

We are given: 1. A ^μ is a timelike vector. This means its inner product with itself is positive: A ^μ A _μ = η _μν A ^μ A ^ν > 0

2. B ^μ is a non-zero vector. This means not all components of B ^μ are zero simultaneously. B ^μ ≠ (0, 0, 0, 0)

3. B ^μ is orthogonal to A ^μ . This means their inner product is zero: A ^μ B _μ = η _μν A ^μ B ^ν = 0

We need to prove: B ^μ is a spacelike vector. This means we must show that its inner product with itself is negative: B ^μ B _μ = η _μν B ^μ B ^ν < 0

Proof: Since A ^μ is a timelike vector, we can always choose a Lorentz frame (an inertial reference frame) in which the spatial components of A ^μ are zero. This is possible because a timelike vector can always be tangent to the world line of a particle, and we can move to that particle’s rest frame. In this special frame, A ^μ has the form: A ^μ = (A⁰, 0, 0, 0), where A⁰ ≠ 0.

Now, we apply the condition of orthogonality (A ^μ B _μ = 0) in this frame: A ^μ B _μ = η _μν A ^μ B ^ν = η ₀₀ A⁰B⁰ + η ₁₁ A¹B¹ + … = 1 ⋅ A⁰B⁰ + 0 + 0 + 0 = A⁰B⁰ Since A ^μ B _μ = 0 and we know that A⁰ ≠ 0, it must imply that: B⁰ = 0

So, in this particular frame, the vector B ^μ has the form: B ^μ = (0, B¹, B², B³)

Now we calculate the inner product of this vector B ^μ with itself: B ^μ B _μ = η _μν B ^μ B ^ν = η ₀₀ (B⁰)² + η ₁₁ (B¹)² + η ₂₂ (B²)² + η ₃₃ (B³)² = 1⋅(0)² – 1⋅(B¹)² – 1⋅(B²)² – 1⋅(B³)² = -( (B¹)² + (B²)² + (B³)³ )

We are given that B ^μ is a non-zero vector. Since its time component (B⁰) is zero, at least one of its spatial components (B¹, B², or B³) must be non-zero. Therefore, the sum of their squares must be positive: (B¹)² + (B²)² + (B³)² > 0

Hence, we conclude that: B ^μ B _μ < 0

Since the inner product B ^μ B _μ is a Lorentz scalar (i.e., its value is the same in all inertial frames), this conclusion that it is negative is valid in all frames. By definition, a vector whose inner product with itself is negative is a spacelike vector. Thus, we have proven that B ^μ is necessarily spacelike.