IGNOU MSOE-002 Solved Question Paper PDF Download

IGNOU MSOE-002 Previous Year Solved Question Paper in Hindi

IGNOU MSOE-002 Previous Year Solved Question Paper in English

Q1. What is diaspora ? Examine the political-economic perspective to understand Indian diaspora.

Ans. The term diaspora originally referred to the forced dispersal of Jews from their homeland, but in modern sociology, its meaning has expanded. It is now used to describe a community of people who have migrated from their country of origin and settled in other parts of the world, yet maintain a strong emotional, cultural, and material connection to their homeland. Scholars like William Safran have identified key characteristics of a diaspora:

• Dispersal from an original homeland.
• A collective memory of the homeland.
• A sense of not being fully accepted in the host society.
• A belief that the ancestral homeland is the true, ideal home for them and their descendants.
• A collective commitment to the maintenance or restoration of the homeland.
• A group identity defined by the relationship with the homeland.

The Political-Economic Perspective and the Indian Diaspora

The political-economic perspective is crucial for understanding the Indian diaspora because it focuses on the dynamics of global capitalism, labour mobility, and the impact of colonial and post-colonial policies. This approach views the different phases of Indian migration as outcomes of economic and political forces.

1. The Colonial Period (Indentured Diaspora):

In the 19th and early 20th centuries, the British Empire transported millions of Indians as

indentured labourers

(‘Girmitiyas’) to work on sugar plantations in its colonies (e.g., Fiji, Mauritius, the Caribbean, South Africa) after the abolition of slavery. This migration was entirely driven by the political-economic needs of the Empire. These labourers were contracted under harsh conditions, representing a clear example of the exploitation of cheap labour for the global capitalist system.

2. Post-Colonial Professional Diaspora (‘Brain Drain’):

From the 1960s onwards, Western countries, particularly the USA, UK, and Canada, changed their immigration policies. They prioritized

highly-skilled professionals

like doctors, engineers, and scientists to meet their own labour market needs. This led to a significant outflow of educated and talented individuals from India, a phenomenon termed the ‘brain drain’. This migration was a direct result of the economic demand in developed nations and the supply provided by India’s education system.

3. Labour Migration to the Gulf Region:

Following the oil boom of the 1970s, the Gulf countries (e.g., Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar) required a massive workforce for their infrastructure development. This triggered a huge migration of

semi-skilled and unskilled workers

from India, especially from states like Kerala, to work in construction and service sectors. This migration was fueled by the ‘petro-dollar’ economy and is temporary and cyclical in nature, governed by systems like Kafala.

4. The Neoliberal-Era Diaspora:

After the 1990s, with the rise of information technology and globalization, a new type of Indian migrant emerged – software engineers, financial analysts, and entrepreneurs. These ‘knowledge workers’ moved to meet the demands of the globalized economy. The Indian government’s policies also shifted, beginning to view this diaspora as an economic and political asset, a source of investment and remittances.

In summary, the political-economic perspective makes it clear that the dispersal of the Indian diaspora is not just a result of individual choices, but a complex phenomenon shaped by colonial exploitation, the demands of global labour markets, and the changing political policies of both host and home countries.

Q2. Discuss the concepts of transnationalism, globalization and diaspora.

Ans. Transnationalism, globalization, and diaspora are three crucial and interconnected concepts in contemporary social sciences that help in understanding the movement of people, ideas, and goods across borders. 1. Globalization: Globalization refers to the process by which societies and economies around the world are becoming increasingly integrated. It is a process of time-space compression , defined by Anthony Giddens as the ‘intensification of worldwide social relations’. Globalization has several dimensions:

• Economic: The expansion of multinational corporations, global financial markets, and international trade.
• Political: The growing role of international organizations (like the UN, WTO) and the erosion of national sovereignty.
• Cultural: The rapid spread of cultural products and ideas through global media, the internet, and travel, leading to both cultural homogenization and hybridization.
• Technological: The revolution in communication and transportation technologies, enabling people and information to move across the globe instantly and cheaply.

Globalization provides the broad context in which transnationalism and diaspora communities operate.

2. Diaspora:

As discussed earlier, diaspora refers to a community scattered from its native homeland but maintaining a strong connection to it. Globalization has profoundly impacted the formation and maintenance of diasporas. Cheap air travel, instant communication (internet, phone), and global media have made it easier for diasporic people to maintain close ties with their homeland and with other members of the community spread across the world. In the age of globalization, diasporas are not just scattered groups but often function as

global networks

, facilitating economic, political, and cultural exchanges.

3. Transnationalism:

Transnationalism is the process by which migrants maintain simultaneous social, economic, political, and cultural ties with both their country of origin and their country of settlement. It is the lived experience of being ‘here’ and ‘there’ at the same time. If globalization is the macro-structural context and diaspora is a type of community, then transnationalism describes the

actual practices and relationships

that constitute life across borders.

According to scholars like Basch, Glick Schiller, and Szanton Blanc, transnationalism involves:

• Economic activities: Sending remittances, investing in the homeland, or running transnational businesses.
• Political activities: Participating in homeland politics, holding dual citizenship, or lobbying for the homeland’s interests in the host country.
• Cultural activities: Consuming music and films from the homeland, participating in religious ceremonies that are linked across borders, and teaching children the mother tongue.

The Interconnection:

The relationship between these three concepts is dynamic.

Globalization

is the engine that enables flows across borders.

Diaspora

is a key human outcome of this process, creating communities spread across the globe.

Transnationalism

is the glue that holds these diasporic communities together, allowing them to create and maintain social fields spanning multiple countries by utilizing the technology and opportunities provided by globalization. In short, globalization is the context, diaspora is the actor, and transnationalism is the process through which the actor operates in that context.

Q3. Explain the nature of imigration of Indians to Gulf region.

Ans. The Gulf region, comprising countries like Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, and Oman, is one of the most significant destinations for Indian migrants. The nature of Indian immigration to this region is defined by several distinct characteristics that set it apart from Indian migration to other parts of the world. 1. Economic Motivation and Temporary Nature: The primary driver of Indian migration to the Gulf is economic opportunity . Following the oil price boom in the 1970s, these nations embarked on massive infrastructure projects, creating an enormous demand for labour. Indian workers, especially from states like Kerala, Tamil Nadu, and Andhra Pradesh, moved to fill this demand. The migration is predominantly temporary and contract-based . Most migrants do not go with the intention of settling permanently; their main goal is to earn money and send it back to their families in India (remittances). 2. The Kafala (Sponsorship) System: The most critical factor shaping the nature of migration to the Gulf is the Kafala system . Under this system, a migrant worker’s legal status and residency permit are tied to their employer or ‘Kafeel’ (sponsor). This means a worker cannot change jobs or leave the country without the sponsor’s permission. This system has made workers highly vulnerable to exploitation and abuse, including issues like passport confiscation, withholding of wages, and poor living conditions. While there have been recent reforms in some countries, the system still severely restricts migrant rights. 3. Stratification of Labour: The Indian diaspora in the Gulf is not homogenous; it is highly stratified.

• Unskilled and Semi-skilled Labour: This is the largest group, comprising construction workers, drivers, cleaners, and domestic helpers. They often live in poor conditions and earn low wages.
• Skilled Professionals: There is also a significant population of Indian doctors, engineers, managers, accountants, and IT professionals. They enjoy much better salaries and living conditions.
• Entrepreneurs and Businessmen: A smaller but influential group consists of traders and entrepreneurs who have established successful businesses in the region.

4. Lack of Citizenship and Social Segregation:

A key feature of the Gulf states is that they offer no clear path to

citizenship or permanent residency

for migrants, regardless of how long they have lived there. Migrants are always considered ‘temporary guests’. Because of this, social integration with the mainstream society is very limited. The Indian community often lives in its own social and cultural bubble, creating its own schools, clubs, and religious institutions.

5. Huge Remittance Flows:

Remittances from the Gulf region are extremely important to the Indian economy. These remittances are not only a lifeline for millions of families but also contribute significantly to India’s foreign exchange reserves. This economic importance motivates the Indian government to maintain good relations with Gulf countries and work towards the welfare of migrant workers.

In summary, the nature of Indian immigration to the Gulf is predominantly temporary, contractual, economically driven, and regulated by the Kafala system, with no path to citizenship and a clear socio-economic stratification.

Q4. Examine how emigration and immigration policies affect patterns of migration of Indian diaspora.

Ans. Emigration and immigration policies play a decisive role in shaping the migration patterns of the Indian diaspora. Emigration policies are those made by the sending country (India) on who can leave and under what conditions, while immigration policies are made by receiving (host) countries to control who can enter. The interplay of these two sets of policies determines which Indians go where, and for what kind of work. I. Emigration Policies (Government of India) India’s emigration policies have evolved over time, reflecting the country’s changing priorities.

• Early Restrictive Approach (1950s-70s): Post-independence, the Indian government was concerned about ‘brain drain’. Thus, there were informal policies to discourage the emigration of skilled professionals. The focus was on retaining educated citizens for nation-building.
• Management and Protection Approach (1980s onwards): With the mass migration of labour to the Gulf, the government shifted its focus to the protection of workers. The Emigration Act, 1983 was a result of this. It aimed to regulate recruiting agents and protect vulnerable workers (especially those with ECR – Emigration Check Required – passports) from exploitation. This policy seeks to manage migration rather than prevent it.
• Encouragement and Engagement Approach (1990s onwards): After economic liberalization, India began to see its diaspora as a valuable asset. The government introduced schemes like the PIO (Person of Indian Origin) and OCI (Overseas Citizen of India) cards , which facilitate visa-free travel and participation in economic activities in India. Events like the Pravasi Bharatiya Divas are designed to connect with the diaspora and attract investment. This policy now actively encourages engagement with the diaspora.

II. Immigration Policies (Host Countries)

The immigration policies of host countries are even more influential in shaping Indian migration patterns.

• Skills-Based Policies (Western Countries): Countries like the USA, Canada, and Australia have point-based systems that select migrants based on education, work experience, language skills, and age. These policies have created a highly-educated, professional Indian diaspora in these nations. The US H-1B visa policy has been particularly instrumental in attracting Indian IT professionals.
• Temporary Labour Policies (Gulf Countries): The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries have the Kafala system , which allows only for temporary, contractual labour and offers no path to citizenship. This policy has created a large, cyclical, and predominantly low- and semi-skilled Indian worker population in the Gulf.
• Policies based on Colonial Ties (UK): Early Indian migration to Britain was facilitated by colonial ties (as Commonwealth citizens). However, subsequent Immigration Acts in the 1960s and 1970s restricted this flow. Now, UK policies also focus more on skills and economic need for non-EU migrants.
• Ethno-Political Considerations (Southeast Asia): In countries like Malaysia, immigration policies are influenced not only by economic needs but also by the political imperative of maintaining an ethnic balance. The Bumiputera policy , which gives preference to ethnic Malays, has affected opportunities for Indian migrants.

Conclusion:

It is clear that emigration and immigration policies together govern the migration patterns of the Indian diaspora. While India’s policies focus on protecting and engaging with migrants, the economic and political needs of host countries determine the ‘type’ of migrant they accept (skilled professional, temporary labourer, etc.). This combination of policies is the primary reason for the diverse nature of Indian diaspora communities around the world.

Q5. Discuss the education profile of the Indian diaspora in the United States.

Ans. The Indian diaspora in the United States, known as Indian Americans, is renowned for its exceptional educational and professional achievements. Their education profile distinguishes them as one of the most highly educated ethnic groups in the US, often leading to the label of a “model minority”. High Educational Attainment: Statistical data, such as from the Pew Research Center and the U.S. Census Bureau, consistently shows that Indian Americans have far higher educational qualifications than the U.S. population average.

• College Degrees: Around 75-80% of Indian American adults hold a bachelor’s degree or higher, compared to the national average of about 35-40%.
• Postgraduate Degrees: Indian Americans also lead in holding postgraduate (Master’s, doctoral, or professional) degrees. Approximately 40% have an advanced degree, the highest rate among any other ethnic group.

Fields of Study and Profession:

Indian Americans are often concentrated in

STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics)

fields. They are highly represented in the American tech industry, the medical field, and academia. Many tech companies in Silicon Valley were founded and are led by Indian Americans. Furthermore, they have a significant presence in fields like finance, law, and business management.

Reasons for this High Education Profile:

Several interconnected factors lie behind this distinctive educational profile:

1. Selective Migration Policies:

This is the most significant factor. The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 abolished national-origin quotas and instead emphasized skills and family reunification. This allowed a large number of highly educated professionals—doctors, engineers, and scientists—from India to immigrate to the US. Later, the

H-1B visa program

further fueled the migration of IT professionals and other specialists. Thus, the US has, from the beginning, selected for India’s “best and brightest.”

2. Cultural Emphasis:

There is a profound cultural emphasis on education in many Indian cultures. Parents often invest heavily in their children’s education, viewing it as the primary path to social mobility and success. This cultural value persists in the American context and drives second-generation children to excel academically.

3. Background of Migrants:

Many of the Indians who migrated to the US were already from urban, middle or upper-middle class, and educated backgrounds in India. They brought with them significant cultural and social capital that helped them and their children succeed in the American educational system.

Diversity and Challenges:

It is important to acknowledge that the Indian American community is not a monolith.

• While the average is very high, educational and economic disparities exist within the community. Some migrants arriving on family reunification visas or from certain working-class groups may not have the same level of education.
• The “model minority” label can bring with it immense pressure and mental health challenges. It can also create tensions with other minority groups and mask real problems that exist within the community, such as poverty or domestic violence.

In summary, the combination of the selective nature of US immigration policies, a cultural emphasis on education, and the background of the migrants themselves has produced an exceptionally highly-educated profile for the Indian diaspora in the United States.

Q6. Examine the future trends of Indian diaspora in Canada.

Ans. The Indian diaspora in Canada, already one of the country’s largest and most influential immigrant groups, is poised for even more significant growth and transformation in the future. Based on Canada’s immigration policies, economic needs, and evolving relationship with India, we can examine several key future trends. 1. Continued Population Growth and Dominance as a Source: The Canadian government has set high immigration targets to support its economy and aging population. India has been the top source country for new permanent residents to Canada for several years in a row. This trend is expected to continue. Canada’s Express Entry system , which favours skilled workers, is well-suited to Indian applicants. Consequently, the size of the Indo-Canadian community and its share of the country’s demographics will keep growing. 2. A Shift in the Profile of Migrants:

• International Students: A huge channel for future migration will be through international students. Canada has become a top destination for Indian students. Many of these students gain work experience using the Post-Graduation Work Permit and eventually transition to permanent residency. This trend will create a younger diaspora and increase its geographic spread.
• Geographic Dispersal: While the Indian diaspora has traditionally been concentrated in major metropolitan areas like Toronto (GTA) and Vancouver, the future will see more dispersal. Provincial Nominee Programs (PNPs) are encouraging migrants to settle in regions like Alberta, Saskatchewan, and the Atlantic provinces, which want to meet their specific labour needs.

3. Growing Political Influence:

As the community’s numbers grow, so will its political influence. Already, a large number of Indo-Canadians are elected to the federal Parliament, provincial legislatures, and municipal councils. In the future, we can expect the community to wield more influence over Canadian domestic and foreign policy. This will include Canada-India relations, trade agreements, and issues related to South Asia. Political activism within the community (including that linked to India’s domestic politics) will also continue to be a significant factor in Canada’s political landscape.

4. Economic Diversification and Entrepreneurship:

While Indo-Canadians have traditionally been strong in professions like medicine, engineering, and IT, the future will see further diversification of economic activity. There will be a growth in Indo-Canadian owned businesses in sectors like transportation (trucking), real estate, retail, and hospitality. The spirit of entrepreneurship is expected to strengthen, generating employment not just for the community but for the wider Canadian economy.

5. Social and Cultural Evolution:

Second and third-generation Indo-Canadians, born and raised in Canada, will redefine their identity. They will develop

hybrid identities

, blending both Canadian and Indian influences. This will be reflected in art, music, food, and social norms. Community institutions like Gurdwaras, temples, and cultural centres will remain central to the community’s social life but will have to adapt to the needs and perspectives of younger generations. At the same time, relations within the community (on regional, religious lines) and with other communities will continue to evolve, leading to both collaboration and occasional tensions.

Overall, the future of the Indian diaspora in Canada is likely to be one of dynamic growth, increasing influence, and continuous adaptation, making it an even more integral part of the fabric of Canadian society.

Q7. Discuss the inter-racial divide of Indian diaspora in the Caribbean.

Ans. The history and experience of the Indian diaspora in the Caribbean, particularly in countries like Trinidad and Tobago, Guyana, and Suriname, is marked by a deep-seated inter-racial divide . This divide exists primarily between the Indo-Caribbean (people of Indian descent) and Afro-Caribbean (people of African descent) communities, and its origins are firmly rooted in the labour and social policies of the colonial era. Historical Context: Indentured Labour To understand this divide, we must go back to the 19th century. After the abolition of slavery in the British Empire in 1834, plantation owners desperately needed cheap labour to work on their sugar estates. The freed African slaves were unwilling to work on the plantations under the same oppressive conditions. To fill this ‘labour shortage’, the British brought millions of people from India as indentured labourers to the Caribbean between 1838 and 1917. The Colonial Policy of ‘Divide and Rule’: The British colonial administrators deliberately created a social structure that pitted these two labouring groups against each other.

• Economic Segregation: Indians were kept on the plantations and in rural agricultural areas, while Afro-Caribbeans moved towards urban areas, education, the police force, and the civil service. This created two different economic trajectories and competition for resources.
• Cultural and Social Segregation: The colonial rulers promoted stereotypes and mistrust between the two groups. Indians were portrayed as ‘thrifty’ and ‘cunning’, while Africans were stereotyped as ‘lazy’ and ‘spendthrift’. Differences in religion (Hindu/Muslim vs. Christian), language, and family structure were used to reinforce this separation. The two groups were also kept residentially segregated.
• A Sense of Competition: The Indians were often seen as a tool to drive down the wages of the freed African workers and undermine their labour power, creating resentment from the outset.

Political Consequences:

After independence, this economic and social division translated directly into the political sphere.

• Ethnic Politics: In Guyana and Trinidad, political parties became organized primarily along ethnic lines. For example, in Guyana, the People’s Progressive Party (PPP) traditionally represented Indo-Guyanese, while the People’s National Congress (PNC) represented Afro-Guyanese.
• Zero-Sum Game: Politics was often seen as a zero-sum game, where a gain for one group was perceived as a loss for the other. Elections often exacerbated ethnic tensions and sometimes led to violence.

Contemporary Situation:

Although over time there has been more cultural mixing and intermarriage, especially among younger generations, the legacy of the historical divide remains strong.

• Political allegiance is still largely tied to ethnic lines.
• Ethnic concentrations in certain economic sectors can still be observed.
• Social mixing has improved, but stereotypes and mutual suspicion still exist.

In essence, the inter-racial divide in the Caribbean is a direct legacy of the colonial strategy of ‘divide and rule’. This policy pitted two labouring groups against each other, creating a lasting social and political cleavage that continues to profoundly affect these societies today.

Q8. Examine the place of Bollywood in understanding Indian diaspora.

Ans. Bollywood, the popular name for the Mumbai-based Hindi film industry, is an exceptionally important cultural institution for understanding the Indian diaspora. It is not merely a source of entertainment but a powerful medium that helps construct and sustain a sense of identity, connection, and ‘Indianness’ for diasporic Indians. 1. A Cultural Bridge to the Homeland: For diasporic Indians scattered across the globe, Bollywood films provide a vibrant and emotional link to the homeland. They bring the sights, sounds, languages, and social customs of India into their living rooms. For second and third-generation migrants, who may have spent little or no time in India, Bollywood is often the primary source of their knowledge and imagination of ‘India’. It provides a shared cultural language that binds Indians of different countries and backgrounds together. 2. The Construction and Projection of ‘Indianness’: Bollywood often presents a very particular, often idealized and romanticized, version of India. It constructs an ‘Indianness’ that is frequently:

• North-Indian and Hindu-centric: The films often focus on Punjabi weddings, festivals like Karva Chauth and Holi, representing a specific regional culture rather than a pan-Indian reality.
• Focused on Family Values: Bollywood narratives emphasize traditional values like respect for elders, family unity, and sacrifice, which becomes a way for diasporic parents to instill these values in their children.
• A Mix of Modernity and Tradition: The films often convey the message that it is possible to maintain one’s ‘Indian’ roots and values despite adopting a Western lifestyle.

3. Representation and Recognition of the Diaspora:

From the 1990s, Bollywood began to actively incorporate diasporic characters and settings into its films. Movies like

Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge (DDLJ)

,

Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham (K3G)

, and

Kal Ho Naa Ho

are prime examples of this trend. These films performed several key functions:

• Recognizing the Diaspora Market: It showed that filmmakers were seeing the diaspora audience as a large and lucrative market.
• Validating Diasporic Identity: These films often portrayed the diaspora as rich, successful, and modern, yet ‘purely Indian’ at heart. This provided a positive and reassuring image for diasporic audiences grappling with their dual identities. DDLJ’s famous tagline “Come… fall in love” was an invitation not just to a girl, but to the homeland itself.

4. Long-Distance Nationalism:

Some scholars argue that Bollywood promotes a form of ‘long-distance nationalism’. This is a nationalism that avoids the complex political and social problems of India (like poverty, corruption, casteism) and instead focuses on culture, family, and emotion. It is an easy and emotionally satisfying way for the diaspora to connect with India without engaging directly with its problems.

Conclusion:

Bollywood is a cultural touchstone for the Indian diaspora. It provides them with an imagined homeland, addresses their identity dualities, and fosters a sense of a global Indian community. While it may present a simplified and often biased view of India, its role in shaping the self-perception and place in the world of diasporic Indians cannot be overstated.

Q9. Discuss the nature of Indian diaspora in South-east Asia.

Ans. The Indian diaspora in Southeast Asia is an extremely diverse and historically deep-rooted group, whose nature varies significantly from one country to another. While trade and cultural (Hindu-Buddhist) links between India and the region have existed since ancient times, the modern diaspora is primarily a product of the British and European colonial era. To discuss the nature of the Indian diaspora in this region, we need to look at the experiences in key countries separately. 1. Malaysia and Singapore: This area is home to the largest concentration of the Indian diaspora in Southeast Asia.

• Historical Background: During British rule, millions of Indians, predominantly Tamils , were brought in as indentured labourers to work on rubber plantations and railway construction. Additionally, Chettiar moneylenders, Sikh policemen, and traders and professionals also settled here.
• Nature in Malaysia: After independence, Indians became an integral part of Malaysian society, but as a minority. Their position is complicated by the Bumiputera (“son of the soil”) policy, which gives preference to ethnic Malays in economic and educational spheres. This has led to a sense of marginalization and economic hardship for many Malaysian Indians. The diaspora here is multi-generational, and its identity is firmly “Malaysian Indian.”
• Nature in Singapore: In Singapore, Indians are officially recognized as one of the four main ethnic groups of the country under the CMIO (Chinese, Malay, Indian, Other) model. They are well-integrated into society and play significant roles in politics, business, and the professions. While they are a minority, they do not face the kind of structural discrimination seen in Malaysia. In recent years, there has also been a significant new influx of IT and finance professionals from India.

2. Myanmar (Burma):

The history of the Indian diaspora in Myanmar takes a tragic turn.

• Colonial Period: When Burma was a province of British India, Indians dominated the economy and administration. Rangoon (now Yangon) was essentially an Indian city. Indian merchants, moneylenders, administrators, and labourers were present in large numbers.
• Post-Independence Expulsion: After Burma’s independence in 1948, and especially after General Ne Win’s military coup in 1962, a wave of nationalism rose. Indians were seen as foreign exploiters. Their businesses and properties were nationalized, and hundreds of thousands of Indians were forced to leave in the 1960s. Today, a much smaller and largely marginalized Indian community remains in Myanmar.

3. Thailand, Indonesia, and Vietnam:

The nature of the Indian diaspora in these countries is different.

• Thailand: There is a small but long-established Indian community, primarily engaged in trade and commerce. Many families have been there for generations and are well-assimilated into Thai society, even adopting Thai names.
• Indonesia: A small Indian community exists here as well, mainly involved in the textile and sporting goods trade. There is a significant Tamil community in cities like Medan.

Conclusion:

The nature of the Indian diaspora in Southeast Asia is not homogenous. It ranges from an established, multi-generational minority community with a complex relationship with the nation-state (Malaysia and Singapore), to the remnants of a formerly dominant but now dispersed group (Myanmar), and smaller, assimilated trading communities in countries like Thailand. The experience and status of each community are deeply shaped by the specific colonial history, post-independence nation-building projects, and ethnic politics of that particular country.